Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.184.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

The Polyamory Words, and the One Nobody Can Date

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind it
What It IsWikipedia, Polyamory; Alan M., Polyamory in the News; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, polycule; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, metamour; Wiktionary, metamour; Wiktionary, kitchen table; Franklin Veaux, More Than Two glossary; Wikipedia, terminology of non-monogamy; Laura Boyle, Ready for Polyamory; Multiamory, episode 322; Minka, Minka Guides; TheBody; Gigi Engle, Feeld; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, About; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, the escalator post; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, on solo polyamory; Multiamory, episode 164, with Amy Gahran; Joreth, LiveJournal; Haupert et al., Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy; Moors, Gesselman and Garcia, Frontiers in Psychology
TimelineWikipedia, Polyamory; Alan M., Polyamory in the News; Wikipedia, Polyfidelity; Wikipedia, Kerista; Maureen Burchert and Shari Tresky, whatiscompersion.com; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, polycule; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, metamour; Wiktionary, metamour; Laura Boyle, Ready for Polyamory; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, About; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, the escalator post; Andie Nordgren, via The Anarchist Library; Moors, Gesselman and Garcia, Frontiers in Psychology; Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association
The ArgumentWikipedia, Polyamory; Alan M., Polyamory in the News; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, metamour; Wiktionary, metamour; Wiktionary, kitchen table; Franklin Veaux, More Than Two glossary; Wikipedia, terminology of non-monogamy; Laura Boyle, Ready for Polyamory; Multiamory, episode 322; Minka, Minka Guides; TheBody; Gigi Engle, Feeld
What Others AddWikipedia, Polyfidelity; Wikipedia, Kerista; Maureen Burchert and Shari Tresky, whatiscompersion.com; Franklin Veaux, More Than Two glossary; Laura Boyle, Ready for Polyamory; Multiamory, episode 322; Minka, Minka Guides; TheBody; Gigi Engle, Feeld; Andie Nordgren, via The Anarchist Library; Haupert et al., Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy; Moors, Gesselman and Garcia, Frontiers in Psychology; Chinese Wikipedia, 多元之愛
ConclusionWikipedia, Polyamory; Alan M., Polyamory in the News; Maureen Burchert and Shari Tresky, whatiscompersion.com; David Wilton, Wordorigins.org, polycule; Wiktionary, metamour; Wiktionary, polycule; Franklin Veaux, More Than Two glossary; Laura Boyle, Ready for Polyamory; Multiamory, episode 322; Minka, Minka Guides; Amy Gahran, solopoly.net, the escalator post; Multiamory, episode 164, with Amy Gahran; Joreth, LiveJournal; Haupert et al., Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy; Moors, Gesselman and Garcia, Frontiers in Psychology; Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association; Chinese Wikipedia, 多元之愛

What the evidence base looks like

  • 27Sources behind this article
  • 5Sections, every one of them sourced
  • 26Read in full
  • 1Read at the abstract only
What the source isHow manyHow they were read
Origin: the text in which a term, a definition, a manifesto, a survey or an observance first appeared8Seven in full, one of them an archived copy; one peer-reviewed study at its abstract only
Reference: encyclopaedias, dictionaries, a citation database and a glossary11All in full; where one quotes a text that could not be opened, the page says so
Community: people inside the practice writing or speaking about it, including former commune members and podcast hosts6All in full, two of them as podcast transcripts; recollections they relay are on the page as accounts
Reporting: a health publisher’s explainer1In full, through a text-extraction reader after the site refused a direct request
Vendor: a dating app’s own magazine1In full; it is cited only for its own stated view

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.