Side N
Measured Twice
Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.
Which sources back which section
| Section | Sources behind it |
|---|---|
| What It Is | Nothing Support Centre (battery life of all three; Headphone (1) fast charging); SoundGuys: Birney on Headphone (1) and on CMF Headphone Pro, with his CMF launch report, Thomas on Headphone (a), Triggs on the Headphone (a) launch; TechRadar: Bolton on Headphone (1) and Headphone (a), Scarrott on CMF Headphone Pro, Marshall on the CMF launch; Schoon, 9to5Google (both launches); Smith, Engadget; Azizan, TechNave; Kamil, Lowyat.NET; Bonggolto, Android Central; Sridhar, Fone Arena; Claude, Son-Vidéo; Regmi, Gizmochina |
| Timeline | The six reviews by SoundGuys and TechRadar; the launch reports by 9to5Google, SoundGuys, TechRadar, Engadget, TechNave, Lowyat.NET and Android Central; Sean, Gizmochina (the CMF launch date); Reyes, TechRadar (the $169 price); Chevelle.fu, Cool3c (Taiwan); Sridhar, Fone Arena (India); Claude, Son-Vidéo; Altmeyer, techreviewer.de |
| The Argument | Bolton, TechRadar, on Headphone (1) and Headphone (a); Scarrott, TechRadar, on CMF Headphone Pro; Reyes, TechRadar (the 4.5 rating); Birney and Thomas, SoundGuys, on all three |
| What Others Add | Nothing Support Centre (the three battery ratings and their test conditions); the six reviews by SoundGuys and TechRadar; Sridhar, Fone Arena (CMF’s cell); Regmi, Gizmochina (the Headphone (1)’s cell); Claude, Son-Vidéo, and Altmeyer, techreviewer.de (the Headphone (a) readings) |
| Conclusion | The six reviews by SoundGuys and TechRadar; Reyes and Marshall, TechRadar (prices); Schoon, 9to5Google, and Oberoi, Android Authority (the reported fourth model); Sood, SoundGuys (the leaked renders) |
What the evidence base looks like
- 29Sources behind this article
- 29Read in full
- 2Independent labs that ran a headphone flat
| What the source is | How many | How they were read |
|---|---|---|
| News reporting: launches, prices and leaks | 16 | All in full at their own pages; four of them report leaks, and relay what another outlet said |
| Reviews carrying their own measurements or readings | 8 | All in full; each states the conditions of its own test; two give only battery-indicator readings, and one has no battery result yet |
| The maker’s own support pages | 4 | All in full; they state the maker’s ratings and the conditions behind them, and carry no date |
| A retailer’s review of a product it sells | 1 | In full; it disagrees with the maker’s reported fast-charge figure |
Reliable
Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin
Worth believing